Woman caught with drugs, media pleads her case

So a female lawyer was caught with a banned substance, is facing penalties for committing a crime and the media is making out as though this poor woman shouldn't be punished.

If anyone should know the laws and punishment it's the people who studied it at University!

So, the title of the article suggests that this woman was innocent until a mean and nasty drug bust caught her out.  What the title of the article SHOULD read is "Female lawyer caught with drugs, unable to practice law", but we'd never see a negative headline about a female in a situation where the media is trying to downplay the situation.

Would we ever see an article titled "Busting of pedophile ring costs teacher his dream job"?  Doubtful.

Man sentenced in threesome murder case

So, here is another case of the 4th paragraph where a man killed another man for having a threesome involving his wife.

Please note, the man has been sentenced to a minimum of 17 years jail for a single murder and was a chronic drug user.  If his wife had been the one who had murdered someone in those circumstances we know that the sentence would be in single digits.

Fourth paragraph for hero males saving elderly couple, first paragraph for man who had a car accident

So here we have another case of the 4th paragraph phenomenon, this time where the media takes until the 4th paragraph to let people know that all the 'heroes' in the story are male.

Actually, they only identify one of the heroes as being a male by that point.  It takes them longer to get through all of the people who saved the couple.

Contrast that with this article where it is in the sub-heading that we find out that, shock horror, the 'deadly driver' is a man!  This is despite the fact that the driver had an intellectual disability.

No sympathy for abused man who murdered, only jail time

So here we have a case of a man who lost control because of a comment his partner made causing him to lash out.

What's interesting is that we know that, had the genders been reversed, a woman who kills a man because of having been molested as a child would have been given a lighter sentence.  Well, even lighter than the sentence she would have received for being a woman in the first place.

So, despite the fact that the guy had shown remorse and had good prospects for rehabilitation, he must serve a minimum of 15 years jail, meaning he won't get out until he's 60 years old.

What use is a 60 year old man who has spent the last quarter of his life in prison?

Whilst I don't condone violence of any kind and it's no justification for his reaction, it was clear that the woman was erratic and was seeking to antagonize the guy.

Man gets scarred, media plays it all down

So a man has been severely injured by his girlfriend in a clear act of domestic violence, only to not only have the media play it all down, but also for the woman to not receive any jail time.  Standard.

The whole article, despite being about a man who now has injuries to his genitals that are estimated as going to take two years (!) to heal, the whole article is basically saying the guy had it coming in a round about way and playing the whole thing down.

If the genders were reversed and it was the story about how a man branded his girlfriend's breasts because she cheated on him, the whole article would focus on the plight of abused women.

Oddly enough, the video at the top of the article was about the plight of abused women (not men like the guy in the article) and detailed the government's plan to make violence against women comparable to violence against police officers - very heavily punished.  So, the fact that men are attacked in Australia more than women overall just means that we really are becoming second class citizens.

The only mention of domestic violence in the whole article is the listing of hotlines for domestic violence at the bottom, which surprisingly also includes one for men!

Another case of the media suppressing gender

So here we have the case of a pregnant woman who had boiling soup thrown on her, but the media takes until the fourth paragraph (including the headline) to mention that the 'customer' that assaulted the pregnant woman was, in fact, a woman.

It's really bad when the media just refers to the perpetrator multiple times as simply "the customer" when they would have mentioned it in the headline had the perpetrator been male.

#the4thparagraph

Woman accused of killing husband, media surprisingly short on details

So here we have a case of a woman who is alleged to have killed her husband on a kayaking trip.

What doesn't make a whole lot of sense is the lack of information about why the police suspect her except that she waited 25 minutes to make the call after he drowned.

I'd be curious to note if she did anything to keep him under, but something tells me we're not going to find out.

A bit like the case of a woman who "allegedly killed her abusive husband" in Turkey.  Notice how the media only bothers putting the word "allegedly" in front of the thing the woman is accused of and not in front of the now-dead man.  Aren't we all to assume that he too is innocent until proven guilty?

The article then also went on to state statistics supporting the allegation against the man, who was too dead to comment on allegations of his abuse.

Media treads carefully when accusing solicitor of raping daughter

So, here we have yet another case of a man being accused of something with the media only too happy to show the guy's face, even though everything is only alleged.

I'm sure the news sites did a lot of checking on what they wrote since the guy being accused is actually a solicitor.

Curiously enough, the mother was supposedly 'involved' in one of the alleged incidents, yet it's only the father's name being dragged through the mud.

If only the police investigate wives who benefit from their husbands death like this...

So, here we have a case of a man going through trial by media because he's alleged to have pushed his wife to her death.  He's also now being investigated from when his first wife died also.

If the police investigated the widows of men who died like they're coming after this guy then there'd be a lot less free widows left, but more importantly, a lot less dead men.  Kind of makes you wonder how many cases where suicide is ruled as the cause of death, but was actually the wife setting it up to make it look like that.

Here's a different case where a wife who killed her 'husband', only to find out that her 'husband' was a woman.

Perth mother assaults 14 year-old girl, gets probation

So, here we have yet another case of a woman being given a pass by a judge for joining in on a fight with a 14 year-old girl, giving the girl two black eyes and getting no jail time.

Who is supposed to be the adult there?  What parent seriously jumps into a fight their child is in and starts punching?

We all know that if a man did the same thing he'd be put in jail, but I guess that's just 'justice'.  Sometimes I think the statue of Lady Justice (you know, the blindfolded woman holding a set of scales in one hand and a sword in the other, signifying that justice is blind, works on evidence and punishes accordingly) should have a third arm for establishing gender, because we all know the sword always falls lighter on women than it does on men.

Elderly man attacked by two girls and a boy, media hides details

So, a 77 year old man has been brutally bashed by three teenagers: two girls and a boy.  It's interesting that the following things are noted about the article:

1. The article itself did not make any of the headlines, only tucked away in other news.
2. The headline focuses solely on the fact the man was bashed.
3. The article takes until the 5TH PARAGRAPH to mention the genders of the perpetrators involved, specifically because two of the three perpetrators are female.
4. The article is quick to point out the gender of the WOMEN who came to his aid after he was assaulted.  Usually, if assistance is given by men they're simply referred to as 'good Samaritans'.
5. The article then only lists the details of the male offender, who it refers to as the "main attacker".  No details of either of the girls, even though his account clearly states that he was attacked by two people at the same time, causing him to fall.
6. The lack of mentioning of any of the attackers being white, coupled with the description of the attacker having "short, dark hair", suggests that the attackers are all of a minority, but the media is suppressing that detail because they fear backlashes.

We can't expect too much from the media.  They're so busy trying to demonize white men that they've clearly forgotten how to report all of the details.  It's a pity that the Government is beholden to the PC crowd, because an independent audit of the media would show clear bias against white men.

Anti-white, anti-male media strikes against hunter dentist

It's certainly very telling what the media does and doesn't approve of by the way they hound this dentist who shot and killed a lion.  Notice the line "the white male, in his 40s".  Nowhere else will you see any minority accused of anything summed up in such a way.

Do false accusers get hounded like this?  No.  They get protected by the courts.

But if you're a straight, white male, expect everything you do to be held to the highest moral, legal, economic and ideological standard of anyone.  Any slip in any of those areas will see you be branded by the collective and attacked in any way they can.

Notice how nobody hounded this woman who killed an elephant with a bow and arrow.  No, she was celebrated for her incredible ability!

So there IS a story about a sperm donor who doesn't want to be known

Here's a story about a guy whose sperm has been used to create as many as two dozen children and who doesn't want to be found.

Amazingly this story didn't make it into their scrolling headlines, although we all know stories the media really wants to keep telling.

Notice how his wife has sufficient concerns that she wants to move interstate?  Also notice how the article has videos linked that have absolutely nothing to do with the article?  Would the media put meaningless videos through an article about the violent death of a woman?  NO!

On the plus side, perhaps this will lead to some kind of engagement with prior donors about how to best proceed, but the reality is the government will throw concerns like the guy (and his family) above out the window in the "best interests of the child".

On what planet do people have to live on to seriously believe that not a single child conceived through sperm donation will want any money from their donor, will not be a danger to their donor and is happy just to meet them once?

When will the government consider the lives of the donors instead of taking the popular option?!  We all know that we'll probably never hear about a donor conceived child assaulting their donor because that would go against the media's agenda.  Either that or, like this article, they'll be safely tucked away on a website you'd have to click five associated stories links to get to!